Ok...here is what I have to say about MW3. Since I was going to post up this video anyway, indeed Infinity Ward is going to be making this game, which is probably the one of the main reasons of me getting this game, but the question I'm asking is...What is this game going to offer that MW2 and Black Ops hasn't already done? I feel like it is going to a very similar game just maybe some news types of modern day guns and perhaps some new kill streaks. They are even using the same engine that they used in MW2, meaning visually it is going to look exactly the same. I can only see myself getting this game simply because of the story line since all the "Modern Warfare" games are connected. This is why I think Battlefield 3, is going to be a well made game compared to MW3. Battlefield overall is a much more realistic game, as far as vehicles they have everything from 4 wheelers to F16's in not just single player story, but multiplayer as well. The engine they are using makes the game play natural. In MW2 if you got in an AC130 you would destroy the whole map from the damage of that plane, but the engine of MW2 does not allow that. In BF3 that is possible. When you fly an Apache, you would leave craters in the ground from all the explosions from it, possibly making it impossible for the enemy team to cross the bridge with their tanks...THATS REALISTIC...it makes the game a lot more natural and for each game to always be different. What's real about a 9 year old sprinting (forever, like you don't get tired) and using duel shotguns. To top it off they would kill you three miles away with it(exaggerating).Now I’m not saying that BF3 does not have its bullshit too, but it has a lot less then MW2. Also BF3 is much more team oriented then MW2 is. For example I have a lot of friends who are really good at MW2. They all have a group of friends that play and they do really well, but what ends up happening is they all end up carrying the rest of the team. Meaning the only reason my friends are winning is because they end up making up for all the deaths of their other teammates. In BF it is more objective, if you are dominating the field and doing what you are supposed to, it doesn’t mean you are going to win. Now there is nothing wrong with all this, if you are one of those people who all they want to do is shoot...that is fine, there is nothing wrong with that. If you were to play more objective based games, I see it has playing Team Deathmatch and Team Objective. Since not only to you have to kill people, but you also have to play as a team to reach the objective. For people who have not seen BF3, here is a video and see for yourself. The game has the new Frost Bite 2 Engine which pretty much blows any other game to date as far as graphics. The Engine they used makes everything destructible. For example is a sniper is camping in a building in MW2 what can you do? Before you kill him, he is mostly likely to kill you a couple times first or someone. In BF3 if that happened simply blow up the building with a tank or Plane, he won’t be going there and no one else will again. I’m not trying to persuade anyone, this is the facts that I have found about both games so far.
Modern Warfare 3
Pros:
- Going to be done by Infinity Ward
- Fantasic Story Line
- Overall Great Gameplay
Cons:
- Possibly not offering anything all that new
- Using same engine as it's previous game two years ago
- Not all realistic as much as people say
- No Vehicles to Drive
Battlefield 3
Pros:
- New Engine that make the game visually look the best to date
- Vehicles
- Massive Player Maps
- Much more realistic (as much as a game can be of course....it's not real life)
Cons:
- Not as many weapons as MW3
- less game modes
- Not as many unlocks (Weapons, Perks, Outfits, etc.)
No comments:
Post a Comment